![]() ![]() He found an extra $2 billion to inject immediately into social housing, on top of the $10 billion fund. Over the weekend, the prime minister went even further. It then agreed to make that $500 million a minimum annual spend. First, it promised to spend up to $500 million a year on social housing from the $10 billion investment fund. Loading.īut this housing stand-off hasn't followed the usual script of Labor-Greens policy disputes.įor starters, the government has made some genuine concessions. Surely something was better than nothing, was Labor's response. The government put a $10 billion public housing fund on the table, as promised before the election. Climate targets, Safeguards Mechanism changes, and a new manufacturing fund were all passed into law, with the support of the Greens.Īt first, the stand-off over the government's Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF) appeared to be following the standard pattern. He would raise concerns, make demands, but ultimately give Labor the votes it needed. Not so long ago, Adam Bandt was being hailed as the new face of Greens pragmatism. ![]() And talk of a double dissolution election, albeit not any time soon, has begun. Instead of pocketing a victory on housing, the Greens kept pushing. The delicate relationship between Labor and the Greens often swings from confrontation to cooperation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |